spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer



CPA LOGO
spacer
Latest News
Hot Issues
2026 Year-End Tax Planning Guide – Part 1
2026 Year-End Tax Planning Guide – Part 2
PAYDAY SUPER STARTS 1 JULY 2026 – Planning guides
Payday Super: 6 Things Small Businesses Need to Know
SMEs to be hit hardest by new trust tax reforms
6 tips to help businesses avoid financial difficulties
Managing your mental health and wellbeing during times of uncertainty
Check out what Uses the Most Internet Traffic: Data from 1994 to 2026
Key tax changes and measures from the 2026 Federal Budget
Federal budget 2026: Winners and losers
A breakdown of 2026-27 Federal Budget Themes and Papers.
ATO reminds practitioners to avoid common FBT mistakes
Why every business should have an AI policy
RSM welcomes updated PCG on transfer pricing for inbound distributors
Major super tax changes now law
ATO taking a closer look at investment properties
Choosing the right trustee structure for your SMSF
Succession planning and why it should be at the top of your to-do list
From Bricks to iPhones: The Evolution of the Telephone
Inflation continues to keep SME owners up at night, survey finds
Payday Super: 6 Things Small Businesses Need to Know
ATO issues new guidance on penalties for non-compliance with STP
Strategies for Effective Debt Recovery for Small Businesses
Succession planning to remain major focus for ATO this year
Fringe Benefits Tax (FBT) Guide – Key Checklist & Rates
Buy an existing business
Most Valuable Industries in the World 2026
Will a shareholders agreement protect a business from a family law dispute?
ATO crackdown on profit restructuring leading to higher tax bills: RSM
Super balance not a priority for young Aussies, SMC reports
When to Update Your Business Trading Terms
Support for rebuilding after natural disasters
Are you ready for Payday superannuation?
Articles archive
Quarter 1 January - March 2026
Quarter 4 October - December 2025
Quarter 3 July - September 2025
Quarter 2 April - June 2025
Quarter 1 January - March 2025
Quarter 4 October - December 2024
Quarter 3 July - September 2024
Quarter 2 April - June 2024
Quarter 1 January - March 2024
Quarter 4 October - December 2023
Quarter 3 July - September 2023
Quarter 2 April - June 2023
Quarter 1 January - March 2023
Quarter 4 October - December 2022
Quarter 3 July - September 2022
Quarter 2 April - June 2022
Quarter 1 January - March 2022
Quarter 4 October - December 2021
Quarter 3 July - September 2021
Quarter 2 April - June 2021
Quarter 1 January - March 2021
Quarter 4 October - December 2020
Quarter 3 July - September 2020
Quarter 2 April - June 2020
Quarter 1 January - March 2020
Quarter 4 October - December 2019
Quarter 3 July - September 2019
Quarter 2 April - June 2019
Quarter 1 January - March 2019
Quarter 4 October - December 2018
Quarter 3 July - September 2018
Quarter 2 April - June 2018
Quarter 1 January - March 2018
Quarter 4 October - December 2017
Quarter 3 July - September 2017
Quarter 2 April - June 2017
Quarter 1 January - March 2017
Quarter 4 October - December 2016
Quarter 3 July - September 2016
Quarter 2 April - June 2016
Quarter 1 January - March 2016
Quarter 4 October - December 2015
Quarter 3 July - September 2015
Quarter 2 April - June 2015
Quarter 1 January - March 2015
Quarter 4 October - December 2014
Bribery, brothels, breaches of confidence: ATO officer loses appeal against imprisonment

A former ATO client engagement officer has lost an appeal against a five-year prison sentence for accepting a $100,000 bribe in return for a favourable tax audit.



.


On 12 March 2024, former ATO client engagement officer Wenfeng Wei was sentenced to five years in prison after breaching the Commonwealth Criminal Code on multiple occasions.


He accepted bribes in return for favourable audits and illegally accessed restricted ATO data on associates’ competitors in what the courts described as a “gross abuse of trust.”


In May 2016, Wei was assigned to audit the taxation affairs of Raymond Schlemon and his company, Global World Group.


That August, Schlemon gave Wei a $100,000 cash bribe. In return, Wei undertook the audit in a way that “significantly favoured Shlemon,” assessing him for outstanding tax liabilities of $136,290, when the audit ought to have identified income tax and GST shortfalls of just over $6 million.


Wei, who also had a gambling addiction, laundered the money through casinos to provide an “ostensible source for the money,” court documents said.


He also accessed restricted ATO data concerning Shlemon in an unauthorised way more than 500 times between April 2017 and February 2022. He communicated with Shlemon before, during and after these ‘episodes’ of unauthorised access.


Wei engaged in similar activities relating to another associate, Chao Chang, who operated a brothel in Sydney’s Surry Hills known as The Ginza Club.


The former ATO officer accessed restricted government data relating to Chang and his business interests over 900 times between August 2017 and March 2020.


Furthermore, at the request of Chang, Wei accessed restricted ATO data on a competitor of Chang’s on 294 occasions. This included personal details, information regarding property transactions, shareholdings and tax returns of the competitor.


The judge described this conduct as “particularly concerning because of the breach of confidence in circumstances where [the competitor] was entitled to expect that a public organisation would protect her from competitors and the gross abuse of trust involved,” court documents read. 


"The offending involved a gross violation of [the competitor’s] privacy as well as of the ATO system.”


Wei was sentenced to five years in prison, with a non-parole period of two years and six months. The sentence commenced on 12 March 2024 and is set to expire on 11 March 2029.


The former ATO officer launched an appeal against his sentence, arguing that the sentencing judge had failed to consider his “contrition and remorse,” and his sentence should be reduced as he had pleaded guilty and co-operated with authorities.


Last Wednesday (24 September), the NSW Supreme Court rejected his appeal, finding that Wei’s cooperation had not warranted further reductions in his sentence, given that his early guilty plea had already resulted in a 25 per cent reduction in his sentence.


In fact, the judges said that they likely would have given him a stronger sentence, given the nature of his conduct.


“Were I to resentence, I too would impose a materially higher sentence for the bribery offence, even taking into account the evidence adduced on the usual basis against the possibility that this Court might resentence,” Justice Mark Leeming noted.


“That is because the offending was serious and sustained, and the errors identified by the applicant are relatively minor in terms of their impact on the process of formulating the appropriate sentence.”


 


 


 


 


 


Emma Partis
29 September 2025
accountantsdaily.com.au




30th-October-2025
spacer
Privacy Policy | Disclaimer