spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer



CPA LOGO
spacer
Latest News
Hot Issues
Budget breakdown – Federal Government Analysis
Winners & Losers
Federal Budget 2024
2024 Year End Tax Planning Guide (Part 1)
Medicare levy surcharge OR basic health insurance ?
ATO warns of ‘serious penalties’ for unlawful tax scheme promoters
ACCC scam report
Employees taking more sick days - and it's getting worse
Foreign residents selling property in Australia
How much does negative gearing really cost – an overview and an opinion?
The Shortest-reigning Monarchs in History
FBT Reminder – Odometer Reading
ATO’s debts on hold campaign prompts new IGTO guidance
A comprehensive collection of small business benchmarks
The 2025 Financial Year tax & super changes you need to know!
Underperforming employees: When can you terminate?
A comprehensive list of guides to industry specific tax deductions.
‘Renewed concerns’ about economy sees consumer sentiment dip: Westpac
Oldest Buildings in the World.
Small businesses may ‘collapse under strain of payday super’, IPA warns
ATO’s hands tied with scrapping on-hold debts, expert says
What Drives Your Business Growth and Profits?
Australian Taxation Office (ATO) shifting to firmer debt collection activity
Why employee v contractor comes down to fine print
Sharing economy reporting regime for platform operators
Countries producing the most solar power by gigawatt hours
Illegal access nets $637 million
Accessing superannuation benefits.
Does your business have a company Power of Attorney?
Labor tweaks stage 3 tax cuts to make room for ‘middle Australia’
GrantConnect
Current Articles
Vimeo test
Articles archive
Quarter 1 January - March 2024
Quarter 4 October - December 2023
Quarter 3 July - September 2023
Quarter 2 April - June 2023
Quarter 1 January - March 2023
Quarter 4 October - December 2022
Quarter 3 July - September 2022
Quarter 2 April - June 2022
Quarter 1 January - March 2022
Quarter 4 October - December 2021
Quarter 3 July - September 2021
Quarter 2 April - June 2021
Quarter 1 January - March 2021
Quarter 4 October - December 2020
Quarter 3 July - September 2020
Quarter 2 April - June 2020
Quarter 1 January - March 2020
Quarter 4 October - December 2019
Quarter 3 July - September 2019
Quarter 2 April - June 2019
Quarter 1 January - March 2019
Quarter 4 October - December 2018
Quarter 3 July - September 2018
Quarter 2 April - June 2018
Quarter 1 January - March 2018
Quarter 4 October - December 2017
Quarter 3 July - September 2017
Quarter 2 April - June 2017
Quarter 1 January - March 2017
Quarter 4 October - December 2016
Quarter 3 July - September 2016
Quarter 2 April - June 2016
Quarter 1 January - March 2016
Quarter 4 October - December 2015
Quarter 3 July - September 2015
Quarter 2 April - June 2015
Quarter 1 January - March 2015
Quarter 4 October - December 2014
ATO’s hands tied with scrapping on-hold debts, expert says

The Tax Office lacks power under current laws to do anything about the wildly unpopular scheme despite plans to review its approach, according to a UNSW professor.



.


Relief for taxpayers with on-hold debts resurrected by the ATO is impossible to achieve without government intervention due to the Commissioner’s inflexible powers, according to one expert.


The ATO announced on Thursday it paused activities around re-raising liabilities previously deemed “uneconomical to pursue” after backlash from the community over the program’s fairness and transparency. 


But UNSW associate professor Ann Kayis-Kumar said individuals with on-hold debts hoping for a blank slate would be disappointed because “the ATO’s hands are tied” with no power to write the amounts off.


“The ATO’s in a tricky position. Being responsible for collections and compliance, it needs to walk that delicate balance between collection but also not disproportionately affecting the most disadvantaged in our community,” she said.


 

“But that raises the question of the discretion available to the ATO.”


Only the finance minister had the power to permanently write off debts owed to the government, she said.


While the ATO could release certain taxpayers’ debts under “serious hardship” provisions contained in the Income Tax Assessment Act, in practice they were ineffective due to being “so outdated and drafted in such a counterintuitive way”.


For example, the current provisions meant the ATO would be less likely to grant hardship relief to taxpayers with more debt.


“That just does not square with reality,” she said. “We need a legislative fix and it really can't be overstated how important that is.”


In the ATO’s statement released yesterday, it announced it would pause the on-hold debts program due to the “frustration” and “concern” caused to the community.


“The ATO has paused all action in relation to debts placed on hold prior to 2017 whilst we review and develop a pragmatic and sensible way forward that takes into account concerns raised by the community,” it said.


However, it said it had “no discretion under the law to waive these amounts and must use any future refund to reduce these debts”.


“In the past, the ATO has excluded some debts from being recovered from taxpayer refunds in this way through long-standing exclusionary criteria, such as for taxpayers on low incomes. However, the Australian Government Solicitor advised this was not in line with the law and so the ATO cannot continue this practice,” it said.


The announcement follows an earlier apology issued by the ATO in November for the “unnecessary distress” caused by its “public awareness campaign” that first alerted taxpayers to the debts a month earlier.


The campaign involved the sending of 200,000 letters to taxpayers and tax agents listing the sums without containing further details of their origins.


Internal documents obtained by The Guardian this week revealed the on-hold debts were the result of the ATO’s gradual removal of filters in its automated systems.


The planned removal of the final filter – debts placed on hold prior to 2017 – would have expanded the program to apply to $15 billion from 1.8 million entities, the documents said.


Ms Kayis-Kumar, who runs UNSW’s pro-bono Tax & Business Advisory Clinic, said on-hold debts disproportionately impacted financially vulnerable individuals without access to tax advice.


Tax agents also reported confusion and increased workloads in attempting to reconcile the debts.


But the community’s concerns could be addressed by giving the Commissioner a “general public policy ground of relief”, in addition to reworking the serious hardship provisions, she said.


A general discretion, as seen in other countries like the US, could allow the flexibility needed to scrap the on-hold debt program in line with public consensus.


“If we adopted something inspired by the public policy ground of relief in the US, the ATO would be able to exercise that discretion in situations like what we’re seeing here,” she said.


“You want decision-makers to be able to make decisions that are in line with community expectations.”


“If we want to see a wholescale improvement to the status quo, we need more reform.”


 


 


 


 


 


Christine Chen
23 February 2024
accountantsdaily.com.au




25th-March-2024
spacer
Privacy Policy | Disclaimer