spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer



CPA LOGO
spacer
Latest News
Hot Issues
Why you need a contract of employment
Tax benefits for unused “carry forward” concessional superannuation contributions
Cyber security and work-from-home become key executive concerns
Largest wind power producers in the world
Chalmers revives 120% deductions for spending on skills, digital
What is Single Touch Payroll Phase 2?
Australian Taxation Office (ATO) reminder to small businesses this tax time
Declare cash sales or run the risk, business told
Sub-trusts ‘redundant’ under final Div 7A ruling
Tax Office homing in property deductions, SMSFs warned
Proof of ownership flagged as ‘biggest’ crypto issue for SMSFs
ATO adds indebted sole traders to credit referrals
State and Federal Covid support --- Aug 2022
ATO casts net wide when it comes to taxable business income
Largest natural gas produces by country from 1970-2021
NALI ‘a special problem for SMSFs’
Tax time tips
Census 2021 Data
Single Touch Payroll: Phase 2 deferral reminder
Largest inflation rates by country in Oceania
Write a business plan
Be wary of trust disclaimers, ATO warns
Tax time guide offers path through 100A
Car allowance increase ‘welcome news’
Articles archive
Quarter 2 April - June 2022
Quarter 1 January - March 2022
Quarter 4 October - December 2021
Quarter 3 July - September 2021
Quarter 2 April - June 2021
Quarter 1 January - March 2021
Quarter 4 October - December 2020
Quarter 3 July - September 2020
Quarter 2 April - June 2020
Quarter 1 January - March 2020
Quarter 4 October - December 2019
Quarter 3 July - September 2019
Quarter 2 April - June 2019
Quarter 1 January - March 2019
Quarter 4 October - December 2018
Quarter 3 July - September 2018
Quarter 2 April - June 2018
Quarter 1 January - March 2018
Quarter 4 October - December 2017
Quarter 3 July - September 2017
Quarter 2 April - June 2017
Quarter 1 January - March 2017
Quarter 4 October - December 2016
Quarter 3 July - September 2016
Quarter 2 April - June 2016
Quarter 1 January - March 2016
Quarter 4 October - December 2015
Quarter 3 July - September 2015
Quarter 2 April - June 2015
Quarter 1 January - March 2015
Quarter 4 October - December 2014
Be wary of trust disclaimers, ATO warns

Beneficiaries are urged to understand the tax effect of entitlements in the wake of a recent High Court decision.



 


Taxpayers should be wary of disclaiming trust entitlements and ensure they understand the tax implications of any benefits before the end of the financial year, the ATO has warned.


It is encouraging trustees and beneficiaries to give themselves time to seek advice in the wake of a crucial High Court decision, Commissioner of Taxation v Carter, in April.


The decision upheld the ATO’s view that beneficiaries who had validly disclaimed their rights to trust entitlements after the end of the financial year were nevertheless liable to be taxed on them.


“As the end of the financial year approaches, it is important … for trustees and beneficiaries to be aware of the taxation consequences which flow from trust entitlements,” the ATO said.


“The ATO also encourages beneficiaries of trusts to exercise particular caution before disclaiming an entitlement from a trust. Further, if they have a tax obligation arising from an entitlement and the entitlement is not subsequently distributed to them, to seek advice as to how to compel the trust to distribute that amount.”


In a decision impact statement on the Carter case, the ATO said the High Court had provided useful “clarity”.


“The High Court decision settles an important practical question as to how trust income is to be brought to tax when relevant trust entitlements are disclaimed in a legally effective manner sometime after financial year end,” said the ATO.


“It tells us that such disclaimers do not disturb what would otherwise be the tax result. Beneficiaries who have an interest in, or entitlement to, trust income should now take this into account if they were otherwise considering not accepting that interest or entitlement and instead looking to disclaim it.”


The ATO had pursued the case, it said, because “the uncertainty in how the tax law operated when a beneficiary disclaims an entitlement was significant to tax administration”.


It had two particular concerns:


- “That a beneficiary could intentionally avoid the incidence of tax by disclaiming an entitlement after year end and that, in certain cases, a late disclaimer could have been part of a scheme with the effect that the underlying income was never taxed to anyone,” the ATO said.


- “The actions of such a beneficiary could have adverse implications for others with an interest in the trust, without them knowing or having a say in this.”


The ATO said the court’s decision did not adversely impact trust beneficiaries who wished to retain their trust entitlements and advised them to be aware of steps they could take to call for payment.


The office has withdrawn its previous guidance on the matter (Interpretative Decision 2010/85).


 


 


 


Philip King
15 June 2022
accountantsdaily.com.au




13th-July-2022
spacer
Privacy Policy | Disclaimer